Skip to main content
NonToxic.com
  1. Home /
  2. Methodology

Methodology

A clearer trust layer for product safety decisions.

The database is designed for comparison, prioritization, and follow-up research. It is not a substitute for medical advice, regulatory determinations, or brand-provided test reports.

Microscope, sample dishes, and lab notebook for product safety methodology review.
1

Normalize product data

Products are grouped by brand and category, then scored using available safety ratings, DEHP values, microplastic indicators, year tested, and source fields.

2

Classify concern

Scores are translated into lower, moderate, elevated, or highest concern so shoppers can compare alternatives without reading raw lab fields first.

3

Expose evidence gaps

Pages show when data is not available, not tested, or source-limited. Missing values are treated as review flags, not proof of safety.

Current coverage

652 products, 275 brands, and 38 categories are included in the generated database. The sitemap and llms.txt files are generated from this same source of truth.

Important limitation

A low-concern score means the available dataset looks better relative to other products. It does not guarantee absence of microplastics, phthalates, or other contaminants.

Evidence standards

What every generated page is expected to expose.

Trust signals are part of the template contract, not optional page copy.

IdentityProduct, brand, category

Every item is normalized into stable URLs, breadcrumbs, and sitemap entries.

SignalsScore, concern, contaminants

Safety score, DEHP, microplastic, polymer, and source fields stay visible.

ConfidenceSource quality label

Missing source or year data lowers confidence and creates follow-up prompts.

ActionAlert or correction path

Templates include capture forms for alerts, source submissions, and retest requests.

Editorial policy

Scores are comparative research signals.

NonToxic.com should cite product pages for item-level claims, brand pages for brand-level summaries, and this methodology page for scoring limitations. Medical or regulatory claims require source review before publication.

Submit evidence

Send product data, source corrections, or retest requests.

Use this form for missing products, updated lab reports, broken source links, or brand transparency responses.

Corrections

Correction policy

When a source, score, product name, brand, or category is wrong, corrections should preserve the old source in review notes and update generated pages, sitemap, schema, and llms.txt in the same build.